The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte THOMAS E. CAREY, THANKAM S. NAIR,
and JENNIFER GRAY BECKMAN
____________
Appeal 2007-0746
Application 10/139,496
Technology Center 1600
____________
Decided: May 30, 2007
____________
Before TONI R. SCHEINER, ERIC GRIMES, and NANCY J. LINCK,
Administrative Patent Judges.
LINCK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a 35 U.S.C. § 134 appeal in the above-referenced case.1
We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We affirm.
1 The application was filed May 6, 2002. The real party in interest is the
assignee, The University of Michigan.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013