Appeal 2007-0765 Application 09/817,826 Baldwin. The purpose of Baldwin's holding board 20 is to allow a user to move labels around. Therefore, indicia identifying a certain position would seem contrary to the teachings of Baldwin. Accordingly, the Examiner has failed to establish a prima facie case of obviousness, and we cannot sustain the rejection of claims 2 through 11 and 15. ORDER The decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 2 through 11 and 15 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. REVERSED vsh GRAY ROBINSON, P.A. P.O. Box 2328 FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33303-9998 5Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5
Last modified: September 9, 2013