Ex Parte Fox-Lovell - Page 5

                Appeal 2007-0765                                                                              
                Application 09/817,826                                                                        

                Baldwin.  The purpose of Baldwin's holding board 20 is to allow a user to                     
                move labels around.  Therefore, indicia identifying a certain position would                  
                seem contrary to the teachings of Baldwin.  Accordingly, the Examiner has                     
                failed to establish a prima facie case of obviousness, and we cannot sustain                  
                the rejection of claims 2 through 11 and 15.                                                  

                                                  ORDER                                                       
                      The decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 2 through 11 and 15                       
                under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.                                                            
                                                REVERSED                                                      





                vsh                                                                                           

                GRAY ROBINSON, P.A.                                                                           
                P.O. Box 2328                                                                                 
                FT. LAUDERDALE, FL 33303-9998                                                                 











                                                      5                                                       

Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5

Last modified: September 9, 2013