Appeal 2007-0786 Application 10/262,142 STATEMENT OF THE CASE Appellants seek our review under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-27. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002). We reverse. THE INVENTION Appellants claim a method and apparatus for scheduling and facilitating a meeting (Specification 1:4-5). Claim 1, reproduced below, is representative of the subject matter on appeal. 1. A method of scheduling a meeting comprising: specifying a plurality of individuals to participate in the meeting and a list of desired resources for facilitating the meeting; communicating with a plurality of scheduling agents corresponding, respectively, with the plurality of individuals and with a processor function embedded with a resource corresponding to the list of desired resources; negotiating with the plurality of scheduling agents to determine availability of the plurality of individuals and with the processor function embedded with the resource to determine availability of the resource; and scheduling the meeting at a time when the resource and a sufficient number of the plurality of individuals are available. THE REJECTIONS The Examiner relies upon the following as evidence in support of the rejections: 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013