Ex Parte Koehn - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                   
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                          

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                             
                                               ____________                                                   
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                               
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                    
                                               ____________                                                   
                                        Ex parte LEROY F. KOEHN                                               
                                               ____________                                                   
                                             Appeal 2007-0788                                                 
                                           Application 10/434,804                                             
                                          Technology Center 3600                                              
                                               ____________                                                   
                                           Decided: May 29, 2007                                              
                                               ____________                                                   

                Before TERRY J. OWENS, MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD, and ROBERT E.                                     
                NAPPI,  Administrative Patent Judges.                                                         
                CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                        


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                   
                                       STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                  










Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013