Appeal 2007-0801 Application 10/654,357 a releasing surface; a pulling surface opposite the releasing surface; a braking surface adjacent the pulling surface and the releasing surface; the pulling surface having a pulling surface proximal portion adjacent the proximal end of the lever and a first distal projection adjacent the distal end of the lever, wherein the first distal projection projects away from the pulling surface proximal portion in a first direction away from the braking plane; the releasing surface having a releasing surface proximal portion adjacent the proximal end of the lever and a second distal projection adjacent the distal end of the lever, wherein the second distal projection projects away from the releasing surface proximal portion in a second direction away from the braking plane; and the braking surface having a braking surface proximal portion adjacent the proximal end of the lever and a third distal projection adjacent the distal end of the lever, wherein the third distal projection projects away from the braking surface proximal portion in a third direction away from the shifting plane. 81. A control lever as shown in Figures 12 and 13. The Examiner relies upon the following reference in the rejection of the appealed claims: Negano US 5,400,675 Mar. 28, 1995 Appellants’ claimed invention is directed to a control lever for a bicycle comprising a releasing surface having a “distal projection” (claim 58), a “bump” (claim 76), or a releasing surface “shaped to interfere with the movement of the rider’s fingers along the respective surfaces in the lengthwise direction” (claim 71). 2Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013