Appeal 2007-0838
Application 09/851,242
K. Claims 16-18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Mancusi in view Bikson and Caskey.
L. Claims 16-18 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Mancusi in view of JP 11-169676 and Caskey.
M. Claims 21 and 27 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as
being unpatentable over Mancusi in view of JP 11-169676 and Applicants’
admitted prior art.
N. Claims 22 and 23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Mancusi in view of JP 11-169676, Applicants’ admitted
prior art and Bikson.
O. Claims 24-26 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Mancusi in view of JP 11-169676, Applicants’ admitted
prior art and Caskey.
P. Claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 16, 18, and 19 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Huang in view of Mancusi and Bikson.
Q. Claim 17 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Huang in view of Mancusi, Bikson, and Caskey.
R. Claims 21-24, 26, and 27 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
as being unpatentable over Huang in view of Mancusi, Bikson, and
Applicants’ admitted prior art.
S. Claim 25 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being
unpatentable over Huang in view of Mancusi, Bikson, Applicants’ admitted
prior art, and Caskey.
We reverse rejections A through G. We affirm the remaining
Rejections H through S. Our reasoning follows.
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013