The opinion in support of the decision being entered is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte ELIZABETH JANINA DAVIDSON and FIONA CRAIG ____________ Appeal 2007-0860 Application 10/148,535 Technology Center 1600 ____________ Decided: August 23, 2007 ____________ Before DONALD E. ADAMS, LORA M. GREEN, and NANCY J. LINCK Administrative Patent Judges. Opinion by GREEN, Administrative Patent Judge. Dissenting Opinion by Linck, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s final rejection of claims 2, 3, and 7. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). The claims are reproduced below: 7. A method for treating a condition selected from the group consisting of convulsant states, bipolar disorder, wherein said method comprisesPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013