The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte AVI J. ASHKENAZI
____________
Appeal 2007-0866
Application 09/993,2341
Technology Center 1600
____________
Decided: August 27, 2007
____________
Before DONALD E. ADAMS, DEMETRA J. MILLS, and RICHARD M.
LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 involves claims 34 and 36-39, the
only claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction under
35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
1 We recognize Appellant’s reference to Interference No. 105,438 which
involved Appellant’s Parent Application No. 08/828,683, Patent No.
6,469,144. We note that a final judgement adverse to all of the claims in
Appellant’s patent was entered September 26, 2006.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013