Appeal 2007-0870
Reissue Application 09/902,904
Patent 6,038,784
FURTHER ORDERED that the Examiner's rejection of claim 11
under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Slipp in view of Folini is
AFFIRMED;
FURTHER ORDERED that the Examiner's rejection of claims 12-17
under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Slipp in view of Folini further in
view of Chang is AFFIRMED;
FURTHER ORDERED that the Examiner's rejection of claims 27 and
28 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Slipp in view of Chang is
AFFIRMED;
FURTHER ORDERED that the Examiner's rejection of claims 18, 21,
and 30-34 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as obvious over Slipp in view of Fox is
AFFIRMED;
FURTHER ORDERED that the Examiner's provisional rejection of
claims 2, 4-7, 9, 11, 18-19, and 32-34 on the ground of nonstatutory
obviousness-type double patenting over claims 5-15 of copending
Application 09/902,965 is AFFIRMED.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED
37
Page: Previous 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013