1 2 3 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE 4 _____________ 5 6 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS 7 AND INTERFERENCES 8 _____________ 9 10 Ex parte ALBERT WEISS 11 _____________ 12 13 Appeal No. 2007-0872 14 Application No. 10/159,762 15 Technology Center 3600 16 ______________ 17 18 Decided: October 31, 2006 19 _______________ 20 20 Before WILLIAM. F. PATE, III, HUBERT C. LORIN, and LINDA E. HORNER, 21 21 Administrative Patent Judges. 22 23 23 PATE, III, Administrative Patent Judge. 24 25 26 27 DECISION ON APPEAL 28 29 This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 21, 24-29, and 31-40. 30 These are the only claims remaining in the application. We have jurisdiction under 31 35 U.S.C. §§ 134 and 6. 32 The claimed invention is directed to a roller blind and a roller blind web. 33 The web is woven with a plurality of tubular pockets integrally formed therein. 34 The pockets can be used at the edge of the web in place of a hem to accept guidePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013