Appeal 2007-0889
Application 09/935,668
Accordingly, we concur with the Examiner that the original Specification
does not convey to one of ordinary skill in the art the concept that the subject
matter of claims 19 and 22, which includes second polyester resins having a
Tsp of 110ēC, is part of the present invention.
In conclusion, based on the foregoing, the Examiner's § 112 rejection
of claims 19 and 22 is sustained, but the Examiner's § 112 rejection of
claims 1, 3-5, 7-11, 13, 14, 18, 20, and 21 is reversed. The Examiner's
decision rejecting the appealed claims is affirmed-in-part.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with
this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(iv)(effective Sept.
13, 2004).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
cam
Westerman, Hattori, Daniels & Adrian, LLP
1250 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 700
Washington, DC 20036
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6
Last modified: September 9, 2013