The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte IAN BAIRD-SMITH, ANDREAS ZIEGLER,
REINHART GEISLER, and WERNER HAMMON
____________
Appeal 2007-0891
Application 09/445,043
Technology Center 3700
____________
Decided: April 23, 2007
____________
Before ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, JENNIFER D. BAHR, and STUART S.
LEVY, Administrative Patent Judges.
GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Baird-Smith, Ziegler, Geisler, and Hammon (Appellants) appeal under
35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 3, 4, 6, 8
through 11, and 13. Claims 2, 5, 7, and 12 have been canceled, and claims
14 through 22 have been withdrawn from consideration.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013