Ex Parte Oosterholt et al - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                           
                            for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                 

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                    
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                     
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                   ____________                                                        
                  Ex parte RONALDUS HERMANUS THEODORUS OOSTERHOLT and                                                  
                                       JOHANNES ANTONIUS JANSEN                                                        
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                                 Appeal 2007-0897                                                      
                                              Application 09/741,926                                                   
                                             Technology Center 2100                                                    
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                              Decided: June 11, 2007                                                   
                                                   ____________                                                        

                 Before JAMES D. THOMAS, KENNETH W. HAIRSTON,                                                          
                 and ALLEN R. MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                 
                 THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                  


                                             DECISION ON APPEAL                                                        
                        This appeal involves claims 1 through 14.  We have jurisdiction under                          
                 35 U.S.C. § § 6(b) and 134(a).                                                                        
                        As best representative of the disclosed and claimed invention,                                 
                 independent claim 1 is reproduced below:                                                              





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013