The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
___________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
___________
Ex parte KIRK TECU and WILLIAM ROBERT HAAS
___________
Appeal 2007-0902
Application 10/077,500
Technology Center 2600
___________
Decided: June 25, 2007
___________
Before LEE E. BARRETT, JOSEPH L. DIXON, and JEAN R. HOMERE,
Administrative Patent Judges.
DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Examiner's Final Rejection of claims 1-22. Claims 23 and 24 have been
indicated as allowed by the Examiner. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C.
§ 6(b).
We AFFIRM and enter a NEW GROUNDS OF REJECTION.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013