The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ________________ Ex parte ANDRESS KIRSTY JOHNSON and MEIYLIN FONG ANTEZZO ________________ Appeal 2007-0907 Application 10/159,367 Technology Center 1700 ________________ Decided: August 22, 2007 ________________ Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHUNG K. PAK, and CHARLES F. WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges. GARRIS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of claims 1-10, 12-15, and 17-23. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6. We AFFIRM.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013