The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________________
Ex parte ADAM MICHAEL ESPESETH,
ROBERT ANTON STEINBACH and
TREVOR JAMES BRIGGS
__________________
Appeal 2007-0915
Application 10/764,9461
Technology Center 2100
________________
Decided: May 21, 2007
________________
Before: RICHARD TORCZON, SALLY C. MEDLEY, and MARK
NAGUMO, Administrative Patent Judges.
MEDLEY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1 A. Statement of the Case
2 Applicants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of
3 claims 1-5 and 7-20. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
1 Application for patent filed 26 January 2004. The real party in interest is
Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, Netherlands, B.V.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013