1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
2 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
3
4
5
6 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
7 _____________
8
9 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
10 AND INTERFERENCES
11 _____________
12
13 Ex parte JUAN A. GARAY and BJORN MARKUS JAKOBSSON
14 _____________
15
16 Appeal 2007-0930
17 Application 10/014,763
18 Technology Center 2100
19 ______________
20
21 Decided: May 18, 2007
22 _______________
23
24 Before HUBERT C. LORIN, ROBERT E. NAPPI, and ANTON W.
25 FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges.
26
27 NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge.
28
29
30 DECISION ON APPEAL
31 This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the Final
32 Rejection of claims 1 through 25. For the reasons stated infra we affirm-in-
33 part the Examiner’s rejection of these claims.
34
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013