Ex Parte Tsubaki et al - Page 1



                       The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is                        
                                    not binding precedent of the Board.                                     

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                              ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                             
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                  
                                              ____________                                                  
                         Ex parte HISAYOSHI TSUBAKI, MIKIO WATANABE,                                        
                                         and HIROSHI TANAKA                                                 
                                              ____________                                                  
                                            Appeal 2007-0932                                                
                                          Application 10/058,924                                            
                                         Technology Center 2600                                             
                                              ____________                                                  
                                          Decided: July 11, 2007                                            
                                              ____________                                                  

               Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOSEPH L. DIXON,                                                     
               and ALLEN R. MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges.                                        
               THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         


                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                 
                      This appeal involves claims 1 through 41.  We have jurisdiction under                 
               35 U.S.C. §§ 6(b) and 134(a).                                                                
                      As best representative of the disclosed and claimed invention,                        
               independent claim 1 is reproduced below:                                                     





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013