Appeal 2007-0933 Page 5
Application 10/310,733
the process for franking the cover by recto-verso printing the documents at
will based upon the threshold determination, since Bucci teaches that having
the process for franking the cover by recto-verso printing the documents at
will in case a value (and the computed value) related to the weight of said
documents exceeds postal threshold would be beneficial for the purpose of
adopting an effecting economical system to save money on papers and
postage.
(Answer 4-5).
8. Appellant acknowledges the Bucci passage of col. 1, lines 36-42, reproduced
above and adds that “[i]t does not seem to require much research to determine that
printing on both sides of the paper will allow double the pages of text to be printed
on the same number of pages of paper when compared to single sided printing.”
(Br. 10).
9. But Appellant disagrees with the Examiner’s finding that the Bucci passage
of col. 1, lines 36-42, suggests recto-verso printing a document based on a postal
threshold determination. (Br. 10).
10. Appellant argues that
The Examiner cites to the passage of Bucci ‘089 described above
which merely recites the known property of printing that you can fit twice as
many pages of printed text on a two sided document. Bucci does not suggest
determining if a value exceeds a threshold and then taking action based upon
that determination by deciding whether to recto-verso print the document
based upon such a determination. Bucci clearly teaches away from the
teaching of Claim 1 by teaching that two-sided printing is always preferable
for environmental reasons.
(Br. 13).
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013