Appeal No. 2007-0943 Page 10
Application No. 09/965,163
Claim 38
Claim 38 reads as follows:
38. The method of claim 37, wherein the web site has a security access code
for allowing access to the website.
A. Issue
Appellant contends that the cited prior art fails to show a “security access
code” for allowing access to the website (Appeal Br. 12-14).
The issue is whether Appellant has shown error in the rejection of claim 38
over the prior art on the grounds the cited prior art fails to show a “security access
code” for allowing access to the website.
B. Finding of Facts
The record supports the following findings of fact by a preponderance of the
evidence.
1. Erlichson discloses the following:
The communication between CCD [client computing device] 100a. CCD
100b and Web server 240 may be secured by any Internet security protocol,
such as Secured Sockets Layer (“SSL”).
(Erlichson [0030]).
2. The use of security access codes is a common way to secure the
communication between a client computer and a web server.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013