The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte ANDREW JAY SKOOG,
JANE ANN MURPHY, and THOMAS JOHN TOMLINSON
______________
Appeal 2007-0950
Application 11/099,264
Technology Center 1700
_______________
Decided: September 13, 2007
_______________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and
CHARLES F. WARREN, Administrative Patent Judges.
WARREN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Applicants appeal to the Board from the decision of the Primary
Examiner finally rejecting claims 1 through 20 in the Office Action mailed
April 12, 2006. 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134(a) (2002); 37 C.F.R. § 41.31(a)
(2006).
We affirm the decision of the Primary Examiner.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013