The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JOAN C. TENG and THOMAS B. REMAHL ____________ Appeal 2007-0954 Application 09/999,0741 Technology Center 2100 ____________ Decided: May 10, 2007 ____________ Before JAMES D. THOMAS, LEE E. BARRETT, and JOHN A. JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judges. JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-63. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). 1 This application claims benefit of the following U.S. Provisional Applications: (1) 60/258,087 filed Dec. 22, 2000, and (2) 60/285,524 filed Apr. 20, 2001.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013