Appeal 2007-0997 Application 09/875,670 FINDINGS OF FACT 1. Cheng relates to bridging a non-IP network and the Internet Web using thin glue layers, which translate between IP protocol and HAVi API (¶ 0011). 2. As depicted in Figure 2, Cheng provides for a bridge between Internet 170 and a HAVi network 130 via two thin glue layers 220 and 260 (¶ 0023). 3. The only proxy is shown as HAVi Web proxy client 310 and HAVi Web proxy 320 included in the block diagram of the thin glue layer 220, as shown in Figure 3 (¶ 0027). 4. The IP Web client 330 allows messaging between the HAVi- specific application 230 and the Internet Web server 180 (¶ 0031). However, Cheng does not show a server on the controller nor a proxy included in the IP network device, as recited in claim 29. 5. Cheng does not explain how a message is communicated between each one of a HAVi network device and the IP network devices, as recited in claim 29. PRINCIPLES OF LAW A claimed invention is unpatentable as obvious “if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013