Ex Parte Hanyu et al - Page 1



                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written            
                        for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                    

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                       
                                           ____________                                               
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                         
                                      AND INTERFERENCES                                               
                                           ____________                                               
                                      Ex parte AIKO HANYU                                             
                                                 and                                                  
                                       BEN WAYNE HICKS                                                
                                           ____________                                               
                                          Appeal 2007-1001                                            
                                       Application 10/602,197                                         
                                      Technology Center 1700                                          
                                           ____________                                               
                                      Decided: March 14, 2007                                         
                                           ____________                                               
               Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, BRADLEY R. GARRIS, and THOMAS A.                              
               WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                   
               KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                   


                                      DECISION ON APPEAL                                              
                     This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 21-26.  Claim 21 is         
               illustrative:                                                                          
                     21.  In a process for the production of a multilayer film having a               
               substrate layer and a surface layer, the process comprising:                           






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013