The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
________________
Ex parte JAMES DALEIDEN
________________
Appeal 2007-1003
Application 10/680,763
Technology Center 1700
________________
Decided: March 14, 2007
________________
Before EDWARD C. KIMLIN, CATHERINE Q. TIMM, and
JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
KIMLIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
ORDER REMANDING TO THE EXAMINER
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-40.
Claims 1-4, 16, 17, 28, and 29 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 102(b) as being anticipated by Ernst. Claims 5-15, 18-27, and 30-40 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over any one of
Erdmannsdorfer, Uebelhoer, and Kasten.
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013