Appeal 2007-1015 Application 10/011,088 claims 31-33 and 36-38 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Blenke in view of Widlund and Newkirk is affirmed. The decision of the Examiner to reject claims 2, 3, 27, 35, 39, 40, and 41 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Widlund; to reject claims 4-6, and 31 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Widlund in view of Newkirk; to reject claims 19-24 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Widlund; and to reject claim 34 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Widlund in view of Newkirk is reversed. In addition to affirming the Examiner's rejection of one or more claims, this decision contains a remand. 37 C.F.R. § 41.50(e) provides that: Whenever a decision of the Board includes a remand, that decision shall not be considered final for judicial review. When appropriate, upon conclusion of proceedings on remand before the examiner, the Board may enter an order otherwise making its decision final for judicial review. Regarding any affirmed rejection, 37 C.F.R. § 41.52(a)(1) provides "[a]ppellant may file a single request for rehearing within two months of the date of the original decision of the Board." The effective date of the affirmance is deferred until conclusion of the proceedings before the Examiner unless, as a mere incident to the limited proceedings, the affirmed rejection is overcome. If the proceedings before the Examiner do not result in allowance of the application, abandonment or a 13Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013