Ex Parte Suzuki et al - Page 9

               Appeal 2007-1024                                                                       
               Application 10/231,144                                                                 
                    Alternatively, if the agglomerated particles are considered to                    
                    not have the same size based on the equivalent process, it                        
                    would be obvious to one skilled in the art to incorporate the size                
                    of conductive carbon agglomerates to a particle size taught by                    
                    Tomiyama. The carbon particles act to conduct the electrons to                    
                    the current collector. The more homogeneous the electrode                         
                    mixture, the lower the internal resistance of the battery by                      
                    having a consistent electrical path throughout the mixture. As                    
                    the particles agglomerate, the surface area of the carbon                         
                    decreases, which decreases the current collecting properties.                     
                    Further, as the particles agglomerate, the amount of carbon                       
                    material able to be equally distributed though the electrode                      
                    diminishes and a spotted distribution of the conductive particles                 
                    exists, thereby increasing the internal resistance of the battery.                
               (Answer 12).                                                                           

               25) The Examiner found, and Applicant did not dispute, that Tomiyama                   
               exemplifies the use of PVDF and polyacrylonitrile in a positive electrode.             
               (Answer 11, citing Tomiyama ¶ 70).                                                     

                                       PRINCIPLES OF LAW                                              
                    Anticipation under 35 U.S.C. § 102 is a question of fact.  Brown v.               
               3M, 265 F.3d 1349, 1351, 60 USPQ2d 1375, 1376 (Fed. Cir. 2001).  A claim               
               is anticipated only if each and every element as set forth in the claim is             
               found, either expressly or inherently described in a single prior art reference.       
               Verdegaal Bros. v. Union Oil Co. of California, 814 F.2d 628, 631,                     
               2 USPQ2d 1051, 1053 (Fed. Cir. 1987).  In analyzing anticipation, the                  
               discovery or identification of a property possessed by a prior art composition         
               does not render the old composition patentable.  Atlas Powder Co. v. Ireco             
               Inc., 190 F.3d 1342, 1346, 51 USPQ2d 1943, 1947 (Fed. Cir. 1999).                      

                                                  9                                                   

Page:  Previous  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013