Ex Parte Matsumura et al - Page 3



              Appeal 2007-1025                                                                        
              Application 10/658,811                                                                  
              cyclohexyl group, an alkyl group having a functional group, or an alkylester            
              group having a functional group, R3’ represents a hydrophilic group.                    
                    The prior art set forth below is relied upon by the Examiner as                   
              evidence of obviousness:                                                                
              Carlson US 2,297,691 Oct.   6, 1942                                                     
              Tanaka US 4,504,563 Mar. 12, 1985                                                       
              Kojima US 6,214,510 B1 Apr. 10, 2001                                                    
              Shiraishi US 2003/0077534 A1 Apr. 24, 2003                                              
              Arthur S. Diamond and David S. Weiss eds.,  (hereafter “Diamond”),                      
              Handbook of Imaging Materials 155-164, 173-89, 209, 210, 217-20 (2d. ed.,               
              Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York 2002)                                                     
                    Claims 1-5, 13, and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as                 
              anticipated by Tanaka; claims 11, 12, 14, and 17 stand rejected under                   
              35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Tanaka in view of Diamond; claim                
              8 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Tanaka,                 
              Diamond in view of Shiraishi; claim 9 stands rejected under 35 U.S.C.                   
              § 103(a) as unpatentable over Tanaka, in view of Carlson; and claims 9, 10,             
              and 15 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable over Tanaka,             
              Carlson in view of Kojima.                                                              
              The § 102 rejection.                                                                    
                    Claims 1-5, 13, and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as                 
              anticipated by Tanaka.                                                                  
                    Anticipation under 35 U.S.C. § 102 requires that a prior art reference            
              describe each and every limitation of a claimed invention with “sufficient              

                                                  3                                                   



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013