The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MICHAEL De ROOIJ and ROBERT STEIGERWALD
____________
Appeal 2007-1052
Application 10/329,906
Technology Center 2800
____________
Decided: June 29, 2007
____________
Before JAMES D. THOMAS, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP,
and JEAN R. HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges.
HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s Final
Rejection of claims 1 through 31, 33, and 34. Claim 32 has been canceled.
We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) to decide this appeal.
Appellants invented an integrated power converter system that injects
an alternating current (AC) back into the mains voltage supply when excess
energy is available. (Specification 4).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013