Ex Parte King - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                           
                            for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                                 

                          UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                    
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                     
                                             AND INTERFERENCES                                                         
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                              Ex parte BRIAN KING                                                      
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                                 Appeal 2007-1064                                                      
                                              Application 10/059,242                                                   
                                             Technology Center 2800                                                    
                                                   ____________                                                        
                                               Decided: June 1, 2007                                                   
                                                   ____________                                                        

                 Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, and                                                
                 MAHSHID D. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                      
                 SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                  

                                          STATEMENT OF THE CASE                                                        
                        This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the                                 
                 Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 and 3-17.  Claim 2 has been cancelled                          
                 and claims 18-23 have been withdrawn from consideration as draw to a non-                             
                 elected invention.  We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).                                      
                        Appellant’s invention generally relates to holographic data storage                            
                 and more specifically, to a method for apodizing or shaping an incident                               




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013