The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte BRIAN KING
____________
Appeal 2007-1064
Application 10/059,242
Technology Center 2800
____________
Decided: June 1, 2007
____________
Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, and
MAHSHID D. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judges.
SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the
Examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 and 3-17. Claim 2 has been cancelled
and claims 18-23 have been withdrawn from consideration as draw to a non-
elected invention. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Appellant’s invention generally relates to holographic data storage
and more specifically, to a method for apodizing or shaping an incident
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013