Ex Parte Fergione et al - Page 1



                The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written             
                        for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board                      
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                        
                                       ____________________                                            
                           BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                          
                                       AND INTERFERENCES                                               
                                       ____________________                                            
                    Ex parte MICHAEL FERGIONE and BARBARA A. JOHNSON                                   
                                       ____________________                                            
                                          Appeal 2007-1082                                             
                                        Application 10/327,383                                         
                                       Technology Center 1600                                          
                                       ____________________                                            
                                        Oral Argument:  None                                           
                                        Decided:  01 May 2007                                          
                                       ____________________                                            
               Before:  FRED E. McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge,                          
               and ROMULO H. DELMENDO and SALLY GARDNER LANE ,                                         
               Administrative Patent Judges.                                                           
               McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge.                                           
                                       DECISION ON APPEAL                                              

          1          A.  Statement of the case                                                         
          2          This ex parte appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) is from a rejection of              
          3    claims 1, 3-4, 7-9, 11, 13-23, 25-26 and 28, the only claims remaining in the           
          4    application on appeal.                                                                  
          5          We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).                                      
          6          The application on appeal was filed on 20 December 2002.                          




Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013