The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________________ Ex parte RICK McWILLIAMS ____________________ Appeal 2007-1087 Application 11/150,806 Technology Center 2800 ____________________ Decided: July 26, 2007 ____________________ Before LANCE LEONARD BARRY, MAHSHID D. SAADAT, and JAY P. LUCAS, Administrative Patent Judges. SAADAT, Administrative Patent Judge. STATEMENT OF THE CASE Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the Examiner’s Final Rejection of claims 9, 17, and 18. As the appeal is limited only to these claims (Br. 3); claims 10-16, which are still pending and finally rejected, are not before this panel. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). Appellant’s invention relates to an automatic telescope capable of determining an orientation without requiring input from a user or an externalPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013