The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________________
Ex parte GREGORY MICHAEL BIRD
Appeal 2007-1109
Application 10/274,758
Technology Center 3700
__________
Decided: July 31, 2007
__________
Before RICHARD E. SCHAFER, JAMESON LEE, and SALLY C. MEDLEY,
Administrative Patent Judges.
SCHAFER, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1 Applicant appeals from the final rejection of Claim 5. 35 U.S.C. § 134(a).
2 We have jurisdiction. 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
3 An Examiner rejected Claim 5 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as unpatentable
4 over the combination of Matsunaga1 and Fujita.2
1 U.S. Patent 6,299,409.
2 U.S. Patent 5,964,576.
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013