The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte BO SHEN
____________
Appeal 2007-1117
Application 09/825,495
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: April 30, 2007
____________
Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, JEAN R. HOMERE, and JOHN A.
JEFFERY, Administrative Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final rejection of
claims 1 to 25. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Appellant has invented a network and method for dynamically and
intelligently routing a user’s requests for services via an ingress server to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013