The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ALEJANDRO WIECHERS
____________
Appeal 2007-1120
Application 09/747,219
Technology Center 2100
____________
Decided: June 19, 2007
____________
Before KENNETH W. HAIRSTON, HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP, and
ALLEN R. MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges.
HAIRSTON, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellant appeals under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from a final rejection of
claims 1, 3, 4, 7 to 9, 11, 12, 14, and 21 to 26. We have jurisdiction under
35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Appellant has invented a system and method of coding an electronic
file. After a received electronic file is stored in memory, it is assigned a
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013