Ex Parte Nason et al - Page 1



                 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                  
                          for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board                          



                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                          ____________________                                               
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                          ____________________                                               
                      Ex parte CHRISTOPHER JAMES NASON, CRAIG FRISHCH                                        
                                          and ANDRE MOSKAL                                                   
                                          ____________________                                               
                                             Appeal 2007-1127                                                
                                          Application 09/800,112                                             
                                          Technology Center 2100                                             
                                          ____________________                                               
                                          Decided:  June 1, 2007                                             
                                          ____________________                                               


                Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO                                                   
                and ALLEN R. MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges.                                        
                MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                      



                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013