Appeal 2007-1149
Application 10/066,273
know how to use the claimed invention” (Answer 6). Because we are
reversing the utility rejection, we also reverse the enablement rejection of
claims 40-44.
SUMMARY
The Examiner has not adequately shown that the claims lack utility.
We therefore reverse the rejections of claims 40-44.
REVERSED
Smsc
ANNE MARIE KAISER
KNOBBE MARTENS OLSEN & BEAR
2040 MAIN STREET
14TH FLOOR
IRVINE, CA 92614
9
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Last modified: September 9, 2013