The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte HANNS ROLAND MISIAK ____________ Appeal 2007-1174 Application 11/001,244 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: April 5, 2007 ____________ Before CHARLES F. WARREN, THOMAS A. WALTZ, and PETER F. KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the Primary Examiner’s refusal to allow claims 1-11, the only claims pending in this application, as amended subsequent to the Final Rejection (see the Amendments dated Feb. 14, 2006, and Apr. 13, 2006, entered as per the Advisory Actions dated Mar. 3, 2006, and Apr. 21, 2006, respectively; Br. 3). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013