Appeal 2007-1207
Application 10/703,917
heating cylinder temperature and a cycle time, but has not successfully
related these variables to the sum of products for estimating a resin
temperature that claim 1 requires.
Searle and Nissei address closely related problems in the same
equipment. Unsurprisingly they employ similar variables. Their goals and
methods differ, however.
CONCLUSION
Searle does not anticipate all of the limitations of claim 1. The
missing elements are also present in independent claim 2 and in claims 3-6,
which all depend from either claim 1 or claim 2. Consequently, the rejection
must be—
REVERSED
lp
HAMRE, SCHUMANN, MUELLER & LARSON, P.C.
P. O. BOX 2902-0902
MINNEAPOLIS MN 55402
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6
Last modified: September 9, 2013