The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding
precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RYOUICHI HIGUCHI,
NOBUYOSHI KITAMURA, SADAKAZU HIROSE,
HIDEO SUKEDA, SHIRO SUZUKI,
and KATSUYA ANNO
____________
Appeal 2007-1210
Application 10/258,733
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: August 15, 2007
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, PETER F. KRATZ, and
CATHERINE Q. TIMM, Administrative Patent Judges.
KRATZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the Examiner’s final rejection of
claims 1, 3, 5-8, and 13-19, the only claims that remain pending in this
application. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. §§ 6 and 134.
An oral hearing was conducted on August 07, 2007.
Page: 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013