The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent
of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
___________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
___________
Ex parte FRANK VENEGAS, JR.
___________
Appeal No. 2007-1219
Application No. 10/798,635
Technology Center 3600
___________
Decided: September 27, 2007
___________
Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, JENNIFER D. BAHR and ANTON W.
FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges.
PATE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 1-4. Claims 7 and 9 have
been canceled and claims 5, 6, and 8 have been withdrawn from consideration.
These are all the claims in the application.
We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. §§ 134 and 6.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013