The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte MARIO LUSI COSTA, CHUNMIN PU, and EDWARD J. BECHBERGER __________ Appeal No. 2007-1227 Application No. 10/416,211 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before ADAMS, LINCK and LEBOVITZ, Administrative Patent Judges. ADAMS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 and 3, which are all the claims pending in the application. Claim 1 is illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and is reproduced below: 1. A continuous process for the production of chlorine dioxide, which comprises: continuously reducing using hydrogen peroxide chlorate ions in an aqueous acid reaction medium which is maintained at its boiling point under a subatmospheric pressure while maintaining in the reaction medium a residual chlorine concentration of about 0.1 to about 0.5 g/l while having no residual hydrogen peroxide concentration in said reaction medium.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013