1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
2 for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 ____________________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 ____________________
10
11 Ex parte DIRK ZIMMER and SARINA GENSIERSKY
12 ____________________
13
14 Appeal 2007-1229
15 Application 10/325,333
16 Technology Center 3700
17 ____________________
18
19 Decided: August 14, 2007
20 ____________________
21
22 Before: TERRY J. OWENS, JENNIFER D. BAHR, and LINDA E.
23 HORNER1, Administrative Patent Judges.
24
25 HORNER, Administrative Patent Judge.
26
27
28 DECISION ON APPEAL
29
30 STATEMENT OF CASE
31 Appellants appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 (2002) from a final rejection
32 of claims 1, 2, and 6-8. We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 6(b) (2002).
33 An Oral Hearing was conducted on July 17, 2007.
1 This appeal was heard on July 17, 2007. Administrative Patent Judge
Stuart S. Levy participated on the panel at the hearing. Judge Levy has since
retired from the Board, and Judge Bahr has been substituted in his place on
this panel.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013