Appeal No. 2007-1237
Application No. 10/813,367
arguments regarding the Examiner’s motivation for combining the teachings of the
cited references. Consequently, it appears as if Appellants are relying on the
unexpected results presented in rebuttal to the previous rejection. This evidence is
not persuasive for the reasons set forth above.
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the prior art rejections of claims 1-8 are affirmed.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal
may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a)(1)(iv)(2006).
AFFIRMED
cam
WHYTE HIRSCHBOECK DUDEK S.C.
555 East Wells Street
Suite 900
Milwaukee WI 53202
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Last modified: September 9, 2013