Ex Parte Rowe - Page 1



                  The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding                  
                                          precedent of the Board.                                            

                        UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                            
                                               ____________                                                  
                             BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                              
                                         AND INTERFERENCES                                                   
                                               ____________                                                  
                                          Ex parte RICK ROWE                                                 
                                               ____________                                                  
                                             Appeal 2007-1241                                                
                                          Application 09/794,486                                             
                                          Technology Center 2100                                             
                                               ____________                                                  
                                          Decided: August 2, 2007                                            
                                               ____________                                                  

                Before JAMES D. THOMAS, LEE E. BARRETT, and JAY P. LUCAS,                                    
                Administrative Patent Judges.                                                                
                THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                         

                                         DECISION ON APPEAL                                                  
                      This appeal involves claims 1-13 and 15-23. We have jurisdiction                       
                under 35 U.S.C. §§ 6(b) and 134(a).                                                          
                      We affirm.                                                                             








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013