Appeal 2007-1241
Application 09/794,486
originator’s vault 216 as being part of the document repository, which is
separated from the document originator (client) 200 by a network connection
208. Figure 2 makes it clear that all elements of the document repository
system are located remotely from the client, including the document
originator’s vault 216, the application server vault 220, the application
server 210 and the database 212 (see also col. 5, ll. 47-56). Appellant’s
remaining arguments all rest on the premise that the document originator’s
vault is located on the client side, and are not persuasive for the reasons
discussed above.
In summary, we sustain the Examiner’s rejections of claims 1-4, 6 and
8 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e). We also sustain the Examiner’s separate
rejections of claims 5, 7, 9-13 and 15-23 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a). The
rejections of these claims encompass all claims on appeal, and all rejections
are affirmed. Therefore, the decision of the Examiner is affirmed.
17
Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013