Ex Parte Chang - Page 8

             Appeal 2007-1243                                                                                      
             Application 10/336,018                                                                                

             independent claims 1, 13, and 19, includes a rotating body (disk) with a side that                    
             holds a fluid, wherein the disk is balanced by allowing the fluid to flow to the                      
             perimeter while the disk is rotated and reduce the vibration of the disk.                             
                    As discussed supra, we find that Hung teaches a disk with a groove (the                        
             groove has a side wall) which accepts curable fluid.  Fact 2.  Both Hung and                          
             Appellant’s admitted prior art identify that conventional methods of adding or                        
             removing mass occur while the disk is stationary and do not discuss rotating the                      
             disk to allow the fluid to reduce vibration.  Facts 5 and 8.  While the Examiner’s                    
             rationale concerning why Hung uses UV cured glue seems logical, we do not find                        
             that the evidence presented by Hung or Appellant’s admitted prior art teach or                        
             suggest that rotating the disk to allow the fluid to reduce vibration.  Facts 5 and 8.                
             However, as discussed infra we find that Goodrich does provide such a teaching                        
             and suggestion.  Thus, we find that the Examiner’s anticipation rejection based                       
             upon Hung and the Examiner’s obviousness rejection based upon Hung and                                
             Appellant’s admitted prior art are not supported based upon Hung and Appellant’s                      
             prior art and we accordingly will not sustain these rejections.                                       
                    Independent claim 7 recites a holder which contains a curable fluid and                        
             balls.  Independent claim 7 further recites “rotating the rotating disk by a motor                    
             until the rotating disk reaching balance such that the fluid and the ball flows                       
             towards the perimeter direction of the rotating disk due to a vibration force                         
             resulting from the rotation of the rotating disk, the fluid and the ball being retained               
             by a side wall of the holder without escaping, the rotating disk being spaced from                    
             the motor; and curing the curable fluid.”  Thus, similar to independent claims 1, 13                  
             and 19, the scope of claim 7 includes rotating body (disk) with a disk with a side                    
             that holds a fluid, wherein the disk is balanced by allowing the fluid to flow to the                 


                                                        8                                                          


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013