The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication in a law journal and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte SRINIVAS GUTTA and KAUSHAL KURAPATI ____________ Appeal 2007-1246 Application 10/014,180 Technology Center 2100 ____________ Decided: June 11, 2007 ____________ Before ANITA PELLMAN GROSS, ALLEN R. MACDONALD, and JEAN R. HOMERE, Administrative Patent Judges. GROSS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL STATEMENT OF THE CASE Gutta and Kurapati (Appellants) appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner's Final Rejection of claims 1 through 23, which are all of the claims pending in this application. Appellants' invention relates to a method and system for evaluating the closeness of two items, where each item is characterized by at least onePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013