Appeal 2007-1252
Application 10/915,714
CONCLUSION
We consider the Examiner’s rejections of claims 1 through 3 and 5 through
40 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) to be in error as we do not find that the combination
of the references applied teaches or suggests the limitations in independent claims
1, 19, and 34. Accordingly we will not sustain the Examiner’s rejection of claims
1 through 3 and 5 through 40.
ORDER
For the forgoing reasons, we will not sustain the Examiner’s rejections,
under 35 U.S.C. § 103. The decision of the Examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
pgc
ROYLANCE, ABRAMS, BERDO & GOODMAN, L.L.P.
1300 19TH STREET, N.W.
SUITE 600
WASHINGTON, DC 20036
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: September 9, 2013