The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte TOSHIYUKI ITO And HARUNOBU SANO ____________ Appeal 2007-1263 Application 10/480,198 Technology Center 1700 ____________ Decided: August 30, 2007 ____________ Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHUNG K. PAK, and THOMAS A. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. � 134 from the Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claims 12-26 and 30-32. The only other claims pending in this application are claims 27-29, which stand withdrawn from further consideration by the Examiner as drawn to a non- elected invention (Br. 3). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. � 6(b).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013