The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is
not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte TOSHIYUKI ITO
And HARUNOBU SANO
____________
Appeal 2007-1263
Application 10/480,198
Technology Center 1700
____________
Decided: August 30, 2007
____________
Before BRADLEY R. GARRIS, CHUNG K. PAK, and
THOMAS A. WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
Primary Examiner’s final rejection of claims 12-26 and 30-32. The only
other claims pending in this application are claims 27-29, which stand
withdrawn from further consideration by the Examiner as drawn to a non-
elected invention (Br. 3). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013